I’m always a little wary of these all-knowing studies – especially ones that contradict common sense. It turns out there is good reason for skepticism. Albert Mehrabian performed the studies – two of them – at UCLA in 1967. In a 2009 blog on speakingaboutpresenting.com, Olivia Mitchell summarized the studies:
Mehrabian’s studies asked participants
to judge the feelings of a speaker by listening to a recording of a single word
spoken in different tones of voice. In the first study, the participants had to
rate the feelings of the speaker after listening to each of nine different
words. The words spoken were often inconsistent with the tone of voice used.
For example, the word ‘brute’ spoken in a positive tone. Each time they had to
make a rating just on the single word they had listened to.
In the second study, only one word
was used. It was chosen to be as neutral as possible: the word was ‘maybe.’
They listened to a recording of the word ‘maybe’ said in different tones and at
the same time were shown photos of different facial expressions.
The experiments were never intended to measure how well the listeners understood what the speaker was trying to communicate.
Since the
original studies, there have been numerous critiques of the methodology of the
research and its application to real world situations. Unfortunately, the
research has continued to be misused by so-called public speaking and
presentation experts.
Even Professor
Mehrabian has said that his findings have been wrongly applied. In 2002, he stated,
“I am obviously uncomfortable about misquotes of my work. From the very
beginning I have tried to give people the correct limitations of my findings.
Unfortunately, the field of self-styled ‘corporate image consultants’ or
‘leadership consultants’ has numerous practitioners with very little
psychological expertise.”
Most damning, perhaps, are these pointed questions posed to
Mehrebian study misusers by Max Atkinson on his blog (maxatkinson.blogspot.com):
1. How come it's much easier to have a
conversation with a blind person than with someone who's completely deaf?
2. How come we can have perfectly good conversations in the dark?
3. How come telephones and radio have been such spectacular successes?
4. How come we have to work so hard to learn foreign languages?
2. How come we can have perfectly good conversations in the dark?
3. How come telephones and radio have been such spectacular successes?
4. How come we have to work so hard to learn foreign languages?
Simply put, body language and tone of voice are
important in any spoken communication, of course. But they don’t beat
well-chosen and well-presented words. Use your words!
No comments:
Post a Comment